“DOGE Canada” mascot is a proud beaver instead of a… “subservient doggo”?
Canuck Melissa šØš¦ :
WTF Canada has thrown away over $100 millions in international assistance projects funded by Global Affairs Canada alone in one month (since Feb 2025)? And this hasn’t even include the $272 millions to Bangladesh announced on Sunday.
Am I crazy, or is this INSANE!? š¤Æš¤Æ
Since Feb 2025 (1 month) CANADA šØš¦ has committed over $100 MILLION in International assistance projects funded by Global Affairs Canada alone. This doesnāt include the $272 MILLION to Bangladesh announced on Sunday.
Am I crazy, or is this INSANE!? š¤Æš¤Æ pic.twitter.com/5blZFNBgpO
ā Melissa šØš¦ (@MelissaLMRogers) March 11, 2025
ThugConDude:
Money laundering, like USAID.
USAID was mostly taken down by DOGE, so the bribes and graft to keep the parasitic class in caviar and children have to come from the slush funds of other countries now.
Exactly why the Canadian dollar’s going down the tubes… spending money you don’t have.
It is insane. No parliament, somewhat crowned PM, and billions walking out the door.
All this while Canadians are lining up at the food bank in record numbers, record homelessness, record poverty, FN still without safe drinking water, record ODs and record wait times. This is Trudeaus last attempt to buy a positions at the UN with our credit card?
Imagine investing these funds into our own country. The Public Purse MUST be reclaimed by the people.
Canada needs a DOGE.
Money Laundering is nothing new to the Great White North… Here is a recent example,
TD Bank to pay $3 billion, face asset cap to resolve US money-laundering probe
- TD Bank ‘chose profits over compliance’, Garland says
- Justice Dept cites ‘convenient atmosphere’ for money laundering
- CEO Bharat Masrani apologizes to stakeholders
October 10, 2024
TD Bank <TD.TO> became the largest bank in U.S. history to plead guilty to violating a federal law aimed at preventing money laundering, and agreed to pay over $3 billion in penalties to resolve the charges, government authorities said on Thursday… More @ Reuters
Followed by a face-saving campaign by the Trudeau Regime:-
Government strengthens Canadaās anti-money laundering framework with new regulatory amendments
The Government of Canada announced the upcoming implementation of new regulatory amendments to strengthen Canadaās Anti-Money Laundering and Anti-Terrorist Financing (AML/ATF) framework and ensure that it is even more robust and effective in addressing threats of financial crime.
Yeah, right.
@stephen_deakins
Make no mistake, as is happening with US funded NGOs, the majority of this money never sees the people it was intended for. Itās stolen by bureaucrats and administrators.
Massive steal of taxpayer money as in the US. Politicians are beyond crooked. No money should be sent to countries except under super strict circumstances. Trump’s election and the DOGE work has really revealed all this corruption. These politicians should all be in prison.
Well, we learned from various scandals that it’s not there’s no law, the problem is “selective prosecution” ie.,
Rules For Thee, Not For Me
Here is one such example whereby the “corrupt regime” of the City of Toronto under Olivia Chow has been violating laws openly and brazenly, posing Safety Hazards to the residents, not once but TWICE under the watchful eyes of current Premier of Ontario Doug Ford, “Crack Bro” of the infamous “Crackhead” Mayor Rob Ford.
Doug Ford/Olivia Chow condones Law Violation that compromised Safety of the general Public knowingly and willfully
Toronto/Ontario has gone to the dogs… Hopeless š”š¢š¤¬
More blatant corruptions openly attributed to Doug Ford:-
The Greenbelt Report alone proves the Ford Regime is Corrupt to its core
Yet Ford is still in power and he has declared himself a “Monarch” who will stay in power forever…
We know government expenditure causes inflation. And inflation destroys the value of money… So, why do Canadians still want Doug Ford in office?
Your guess is as good as ours… Guess “peasants” have no say when it comes to “power-that-be”?
Mark Twain once said that “If voting made a difference, they wouldn’t let us do it. “
Tell me Canada is an authoritarian state without saying it’s an authoritarian state.
Now what?
Must we peasants start a Bloody Revolution just to have changes?
Can establishment of “DOGE Canada” helps to clean up Canada Global Affairs of abuse, waste, and corruption like USAID of U.S.?
As usual, we turn to CanuckAI for enlightenment:-
Establishing a “DOGE Canada” (a dedicated oversight body similar to the U.S. Office of the Inspector General for USAID) could potentially help address issues of abuse, waste, and corruption within Global Affairs Canada (GAC), but its effectiveness would depend on several factors. Here’s a breakdown of how such an initiative could help, as well as the challenges it might face:
How “DOGE Canada” Could Help Clean Up Global Affairs Canada
- Enhanced Accountability
- A dedicated oversight body would provide focused scrutiny on GAC’s operations, ensuring that programs, funds, and policies are implemented as intended.
- It could act as an independent watchdog, reducing the risk of internal conflicts of interest or cover-ups.
- Targeted Investigations
- Similar to the U.S. OIG, “DOGE Canada” could conduct audits, investigations, and inspections specifically tailored to GAC’s activities, including international aid, diplomatic operations, and trade initiatives.
- It could identify inefficiencies, fraud, and mismanagement more effectively than broader oversight bodies.
- Whistleblower Protection
- A specialized body could provide stronger protections for whistleblowers within GAC, encouraging employees to report misconduct without fear of retaliation.
- Public Trust
- A visible and independent oversight body could improve public confidence in Canada’s international affairs and aid programs by demonstrating a commitment to transparency and accountability.
- Learning from USAID’s OIG
- The U.S. OIG has a proven track record of uncovering waste, fraud, and abuse within USAID. A similar body in Canada could adopt best practices from the U.S. model, such as regular reporting, public disclosure of findings, and recommendations for systemic improvements.
Challenges and Considerations
- Bureaucratic Overlap
- Canada already has oversight bodies like the Office of the Auditor General (OAG) and the Public Sector Integrity Commissioner (PSIC). A new body could risk duplicating efforts or creating confusion about jurisdictional boundaries.
- Cost and Resources
- Establishing and maintaining a new oversight body would require significant financial and human resources. This could be a hard sell politically, especially if existing mechanisms are perceived as sufficient.
- Political Will
- The success of such a body would depend on strong political support. If the government or senior officials resist oversight, the body could be undermined or rendered ineffective.
- Cultural Resistance
- Bureaucratic resistance within GAC could hinder the effectiveness of a new oversight body. Employees and managers might view it as intrusive or adversarial, leading to pushback.
- Scope and Authority
- For “DOGE Canada” to be effective, it would need clear authority to access information, conduct investigations, and enforce recommendations. Without sufficient powers, it could become a toothless entity.
Comparison to USAID’s OIG
The U.S. OIG has been successful in uncovering significant waste, fraud, and abuse within USAID. For example:
- It has exposed cases of mismanaged funds, fraudulent contractors, and ineffective programs.
- It regularly publishes reports and recommendations, which USAID is required to address.
If “DOGE Canada” were modeled after the U.S. OIG, it could similarly:
- Conduct regular audits and investigations.
- Publish findings and recommendations publicly.
- Work collaboratively with GAC to implement reforms.
Alternative Approaches
Instead of creating a new body, Canada could consider:
- Strengthening existing oversight mechanisms (e.g., expanding the OAG’s mandate or increasing funding for the PSIC).
- Enhancing internal controls and accountability measures within GAC.
- Increasing transparency by mandating regular public reporting on GAC’s activities and expenditures.
Conclusion
Establishing a “DOGE Canada” could be a powerful tool for cleaning up abuse, waste, and corruption within Global Affairs Canada, particularly if it is designed with sufficient authority, independence, and resources. However, it is not the only solution. Canada could also achieve similar results by strengthening existing oversight bodies and improving internal accountability mechanisms. The decision would ultimately depend on a cost-benefit analysis and the political will to prioritize transparency and integrity in Canada’s international affairs.
What do you think?
We at CanuckPost think it won’t work because it’s a chronic systemic issue… It’s cancer, so to speak.
We learned from various scandals in the past it’s not that there’s no law, the problem is enforcemnet — “selective prosecution” ie.,
Rules For Thee, Not For Me
Until the crooks and criminals running Canada are decimated, nothing will change… at least no meaning change can be anticipated.
Justin Trudeau started with “Black Face”… and he ended up leaving by taking away things that’s not his?
āTough Guyā Doug Ford slapped 25% Levy on US-bound Electricity, but āChickened Outā hours later by Suspending the surcharge after Trump threatens to raise Tariffs on Steel & Aluminum to a whopping 50%
Leave a Reply