Alberta premier Danielle Smith is under fire for comments she made in an early March interview with Breitbart where she suggested that she asked Trump administration officials to pause tariffs until after the Canadian federal election to help Pierre Poilievre win.
Alberta premier Danielle Smith says that she attempted to influence the US administration to hold off on tariffs to give Pierre Poilievre the best chance at winning the upcoming election… Because he’ll align Canada with Trump the most. #abpoli #ableg #cdnpoli
byu/Appropriate_Duty_930 inSaveTheCBC
‘Let’s just put things on pause’: Alberta premier under fire for Breitbart interview
Alberta Premier Danielle Smith is under fire for an interview she did March 8 with Breitbart in the U.S. over controversial remarks that appear to suggest she asked the Trump administration to lay off their tariff threats until after a Canadian federal election in the hopes of seeing Pierre Poilievre and the Conservatives elected.
In the interview, with Breitbart Washington correspondent Matthew Boyle, Smith lambasted Prime Minister Trudeau’s handling of U.S. President Donald Trump’s tariff threats and said she had pitched U.S. government officials on the idea of pausing the implementation of tariffs until the federal election is over, with the hopes of seeing Conservative Pierre Poilievre elected.
“The longer this (tariff) dispute goes on, politicians posture, and it seems to be benefiting the Liberals right now,” Smith said. “So I would hope that we could put things on pause is what I’ve told administration officials.
“Let’s just put things on pause so we can get through an election.”
A number of Canadian political observers criticized the interview on social media.
“Something kind of weird about this,” said former Postmedia columnist Stephen Maher, who is the author of a biography of Justin Trudeau. “Canadians should decide Canadian elections, and Canadian politicians should not ask the Americans to interfere by delaying trade actions until after we vote.”
A similar comment was offered by Alberta economics professor Andrew Leach, who said, “Particularly, Canadian Premiers should not be asking foreign administrations to alter their policies so as to affect Canadian elections in a manner that the premier would like.”
Particularly, Canadian Premiers should not be asking foreign administrations to alter their policies so as to affect Canadian elections in a manner that the Premier would like. https://t.co/z0Z2O1nMwZ
— Andrew Leach (@andrew_leach) March 23, 2025
Mount Royal University political scientist Duane Bratt reposted a link to the article with a one-line comment.
“This is a damaging interview by Smith,” he said.
From Breitbart,
Exclusive – Canadian Premier Danielle Smith: Trudeau Blew Tariff Negotiations in First Mar-a-Lago Meeting
Alberta, Canada, Premier Danielle Smith of the United Conservative Party told Breitbart News Saturday on Sirius XM that Prime Minister Justin Trudeau set Canada back in negotiations with America during his first meeting with President Donald Trump at Mar-a-Lago.
Smith joined Breitbart News Washington bureau chief Matthew Boyle for a segment on the program where they discussed tariffs and the upcoming Canadian prime minister election.
When Boyle asked Smith how she thinks Trudeau has handled negotiations with President Donald Trump, she suggested Canada “got into a ditch” in the leaders’ initial Mar-a-Lago meeting. Trudeau and Trump met at Trump’s luxurious resort in Palm Beach, Florida, in November following the election.
“I can tell you, I think we got into a ditch with the very first meeting in Mar-a-Lago. I’ve seen the president reference many times since then the exchange–I think two blunders: One was the on the issue of NATO,” she said. “We know the American president expects for all of the trade partners to reach their two percent NATO commitment, and Canada still hasn’t committed to doing that until 2032, so I think that was one problem. And then, yes… he said that tariffs would result in Canada collapsing, and I think that was the wrong message to convey because it made us sound very, very weak.”
Smith added that Canada’s dependence on trade with the United States is “mutually beneficial.”
“I mean, we are definitely dependent on U.S. trade… We certainly have more dependence on U.S. trade than in any other market, but it’s mutually beneficial,” she said. “And I wish that we’d been able to convey earlier on just how much the Americans benefit from being able to buy cheap and discounted raw materials and intermediate products so they can do the value added to create American jobs and also keep prices lower for consumers.”
“That’s the partnership that we have. And Canada, in exchange, also becomes the principal buyer of American-produced products. We’re your biggest customers,” she added. “So I think that we started off on the wrong foot, and now we’ve been trying to get that information out because we really should maintain this tariff-free relationship between our two countries. Our industries are so integrated, and it’s good for both partners.”
‘Elbows Up, Canada!’ rally coming to Toronto this weekend
Trump signed an executive order Thursday delaying until April 2 the 25-percent tariffs he is imposing on Canada and Mexico. Canadian energy products will face a smaller ten-percent additional tariff when they go into effect next month.
When asked whether Trudeau was attempting to use the back and forth with Trump as a means to stay in power, considering he is on the brink of removal, Smith said, “No, Trudeau’s gone tomorrow.”
She said to expect “a new prime minister within the next couple of days.” The new prime minister will be tasked with setting an election for the next prime minister and will have “the latitude to go as long as October before they call an election if they can continue to get support in our legislature.”
She said the Liberal Party’s Chrystia Freeland or Mark Carney are the likeliest to succeed Trudeau, so one of them would set a date for an election for prime minister. The Liberal Party will hold a vote for their new leader on Sunday.
Smith also contended that the tariff war is harming conservatives’ chances in the upcoming election that will be set by Trudeau’s successor.
“Are the Canadian people ready to go back the other way here and go away from the liberal side that we’ve seen under Trudeau and whoever replaces him?” Boyle asked Smith.
He noted in his question that a conservative prime minister would likely have a better working relationship with Trump than a liberal prime minister.
“Before the tariff war, I would say yes. I mean, Pierre Poilievre is the name of the Conservative Party leader, and he was miles ahead of Justin Trudeau. But because of what we see as unjust and unfair tariffs, it’s actually caused an increase in the support for the liberals,” Smith responded. “And so that’s what I fear, is that the longer this dispute goes on, politicians posture, and it seems to be benefiting the Liberals right now. So I would hope that we could put things on pause is what I’ve told administration officials. Let’s just put things on pause so we can get through an election.”
She told Boyle that Poilievre, as prime minister, would open the door to a number of opportunities between Canada and the United States.
“Let’s have the best person at the table make the argument… and I think that’s Pierre Poilievre, and I do agree with you that… if we do have Pierre as our prime minister, then I think that there’s a number of things that we could do together,” Smith detailed. “Pierre believes in development. He believes in low-cost energy. He believes that we need to have low taxes, doesn’t believe in any of the woke stuff that we’ve seen taking over our politics for the last five years.
“So I would think that there’d be, there’s probably still always going to be areas that are skirmishes or disputes about particular industries when it comes to the border, but I would say, on balance, the perspective that Pierre would bring would be very much in sync with, I think…the new direction in America,” she added. “And I think we’d have a really great relationship for the period of time they’re both in.”
Feces smeared on Edmonton’s Wayne Gretzky statue
His MRU colleague Lori Williams said, in an email to CTV News, “This is not surprising, but potentially problematic for Poilievre – especially the reference to just pausing the tariffs and woke stuff.
“This could reinforce views about PP (Poilievre) being Trump-like.”
In another part of the interview, Smith appeared to lobby for Poilievre as the candidate most likely to align with the Trump administration’s policies.
“If we do have Pierre as our prime minister, then I think that there’s a number of things that we could do together,” Smith said. “Pierre believes in development. He believes in low-cost energy. He believes that we need to have low taxes, doesn’t believe in any of the woke stuff that we’ve seen taking over our politics for the last five years.
“So I would think that there’d be, there’s probably still always going to be areas that are skirmishes or disputes about particular industries when it comes to the border, but I would say, on balance, the perspective that Pierre would bring would be very much in sync with, I think…the new direction in America,” she added. “And I think we’d have a really great relationship for the period of time they’re both in (office).”
Public policy expert Ken Boessenkool posted on X that, “When Danielle Smith ran for the leadership of the UCP, I argued that she was unfit for public office.
“This interview (and the fact she didn’t tell Albertans about it) prove I was right.
“I don’t believe in recall,” he added, “but I’m open to an exception here.”
When Danielle Smith ran for the leadership of the UCP, I argued that she was unfit for public office.
This interview (and the fact she didn’t tell Albertans about it!) prove I was right.
I don’t believe in recall, but I’m open to an exception here. https://t.co/GVA77bzjgs
— Ken Boessenkool (@KenBoessenkool) March 23, 2025
Poilievre responds
At a press kickoff for the April 28 federal election on Sunday morning, Conservative leader Pierre Poilievre was asked if he considered Smith’s comments to the U.S. administration appropriate.
“Well, my response is that the President has said that he thinks it would be easier to deal with a liberal and with good reason, the liberals have weakened our country,” Poilievre said. “They’ve blocked resource projects, raised taxes, driving our jobs south into the hands of the Americans. A half a trillion dollars of investment has fled our country.”
“They blocked a pipeline that would have allowed us to go around the American market,” he added. “They’ve killed LNG liquefaction plants, forcing us to sell all of our natural gas to the Americans at huge price discounts.
“They’ve weakened our military and our borders, all of that plays into the hands of President Trump. military and our borders, all of that plays into the hands of President Trump.”
Carney responds
At the kickoff to the election at 24 Sussex, Liberal Leader Mark Carney was asked about Smith’s comments and whether he could work with her.
“My responsibility is to work with all Canadians, all stakeholders, certainly with the premiers, with national Indigenous organizations, with labour, with other stakeholders, with everyone,” Carney said.
“That’s my responsibility. I take that seriously,” he said.
“I was pleased that at the First Ministers meeting, we had consent on our communique, on our objectives.
“We have to follow through with that action for that.
“With respect to the premier’s comments, I take note of her alignment of Mr. Poilievre with Mr. Trump,” he said, continuing. “And would note that that’s one of the decisions that Canadians will have to make, whether they want a government that’s unified, that’s standing up for Canada and is taking focused action to build a better economy or they want division –and Americanism.“That’s what Mr. Poilievre seems to be offering,” he said, “and just endorsed by the Premier of Alberta.”
‘It hurts Danielle Smith’
In a Sunday interview with CTV News, MRU political scientist Duane Bratt described Smith’s request to pause tariffs for the election campaign as “astounding.”
“It’s astounding, where she is encouraging the U.S. administration to pause their tariffs for the election campaign, not because tariffs are bad, which they are, not because tariffs damage both Canada in the U.S., which they do, but because she believes that this trade war has benefited the Liberal Party,” he said.
“It hurts Danielle Smith, because it looks like she is supporting the United States in the middle of a major trade war against Canada,” he added. “It looks like she is clearly supporting Pierre Poilievre which she is, and I think that’s going to backfire on Poilievre.”
“You’re going to see this in a Liberal attack ad against Poilievre, quoting Smith, right?” Bratt added. “Because she’s saying that the Liberals are going to fight the Americans on tariffs (whereas) Poilievre is much more aligned with you, so you don’t need to worry about him.”
Bratt said Carney’s reaction to Smith’s comments were diplomatic.
“I thought it was a pretty diplomatic response by Mark Carney,” he said, “acknowledging the complaints of Smith, acknowledging that they’ve working to deal with some of those, but also putting his attacks on Poilievre, not on Smith, because if Carney wins the election, he doesn’t need to worry about Pierre Poilievre, he needs to worry about Danielle Smith.”
Smith denies interference claims
Sunday afternoon, the Premier’s office sent a statement to CTV News.
“Any suggestion the Premier is asking the U.S. to interfere in Canada’s election is offensive and false,” it said.
Additionally, Smith said, “For the last several months, I, and many of my fellow Premiers, have been working relentlessly to convince U.S. officials at all levels just how damaging threatened tariffs will be to both Canadians and Americans.
“I’ve also repeatedly asked those same officials to refrain from placing any tariffs on Canadian goods until a proper renegotiation of CUSMA can be held following our federal election with a Prime Minister that has won a mandate from Canadians to negotiate with the U.S. President.
“Now that an election has been called, I would reiterate my hope that the United States would refrain from placing tariffs on their closest ally and largest trading partner during the middle of the election.
“I, along with the vast majority of Albertans, are obviously concerned with how vulnerable and weak the Liberal Government has left our country after the last 10 years of anti-resource development policies, and I have yet to see any meaningful commitment to reverse those policies that warrants giving them a fourth consecutive mandate. However, that decision is ultimately up to Canadians.”
The family quarrels… O Canada
In a move designed to unite the country, Canada is set to change our 20 Dollar Bill
🔥 Extremely polite moose bull gently reminds a tourist that wildlife should be respected
🔥 Extremely polite moose bull gently reminds a tourist that wildlife should be respected
byu/quick_justice inNatureIsFuckingLit
Fact Check: Nine Trump false claims about Canada 🇨🇦 15 Interesting facts about Canada
Whaddaya Say?