Should Canada Ditch F-35s as it’s a Strategic Vulnerability? If so, should Canada purchase Fighter Jets from China instead… such as the J20 and J35, perhaps also Warships, Drones, etc?

The decision for Canada to cancel the purchase of F-35 fighter jets from the U.S. is a complex and debated topic, involving considerations of national defense, economic impact, and geopolitical relationships. Here are some arguments for and against canceling the purchase:

---

Arguments for Canceling the Purchase

1. 1. High Costs:

      • The F-35 program is one of the most expensive military projects in history. Canceling the purchase could free up funds for other priorities, such as healthcare, education, or infrastructure.
      • Operating and maintaining the F-35s over their lifespan could strain Canada’s defense budget.

   2. Questionable Necessity:

      • Critics argue that Canada does not face immediate threats that require advanced stealth fighter jets. The funds could be redirected to other defense needs, such as cybersecurity or Arctic sovereignty.

China’s DF-17 Hypersonic Missiles with HGV

1. Domestic Economic Impact:

   • Some argue that investing in the F-35 program primarily benefits U.S. defense contractors. Canceling the purchase could allow Canada to invest in its own defense industry or other domestic projects.

2. Environmental Concerns:

   • The F-35s are fuel-intensive and contribute to carbon emissions. Canceling the purchase could align with Canada’s climate goals and commitments to reducing its carbon footprint.

3. Geopolitical Considerations:

   • Some Canadians believe that relying on U.S.-made military equipment undermines Canada’s sovereignty and independence. Canceling the purchase could signal a shift toward a more independent defense policy.

China’s NGAD “White Emperor”

Chinese Aircraft Carriers

---

Arguments Against Canceling the Purchase

1. Modernizing Canada’s Air Force:

   • Canada’s current fleet of CF-18 fighter jets is aging and needs replacement. The F-35 is a state-of-the-art aircraft that would ensure Canada’s air force remains competitive and capable of meeting modern threats.

2. Interoperability with Allies:

   • The F-35 is used by NATO allies, including the U.S. and the U.K. Purchasing the F-35 ensures Canada can operate seamlessly with its allies in joint missions and defense operations.

3. Long-Term Cost Efficiency:

   • While the upfront costs are high, the F-35 is designed to be cost-effective over its lifespan due to its advanced technology and lower maintenance requirements compared to older aircraft.

4. Economic Benefits for Canada:

   • The F-35 program includes industrial partnerships that benefit Canadian companies. Canceling the purchase could harm these businesses and result in job losses.

5. Deterrence and Security:

   • The F-35’s advanced stealth and combat capabilities serve as a deterrent to potential adversaries. Canceling the purchase could weaken Canada’s defense posture and its ability to respond to emerging threats.

---

Conclusion

The decision to cancel or proceed with the F-35 purchase involves weighing Canada’s defense needs, economic interests, and long-term strategic goals. While canceling the purchase could save money and align with certain domestic priorities, it might also compromise Canada’s military readiness and its ability to collaborate with allies. A thorough evaluation of these factors is essential to make an informed decision.

J36 & J50

---

Since Canada should Ditch F-35 as Defence Experts warn U.S. will control key systems on F-35 fighter jets, putting Canada at unacceptable Risk…

Then should Canada purchase Fighter Jets from China instead… such as the J20 and J35, perhaps also Warships, Drones, etc?

The idea of Canada purchasing military equipment, such as fighter jets (e.g., China’s J-20 or J-35), warships, or drones, from China is highly controversial and raises significant strategic, political, and ethical concerns. While the debate over the F-35 purchase is valid, shifting to Chinese-made military hardware introduces a new set of risks and challenges. Here’s a breakdown of why this might not be a viable or advisable option for Canada:

---

1. Geopolitical and Strategic Risks

• Alignment with Western Allies: Canada is a member of NATO and a close ally of the United States and other Western nations. Purchasing military equipment from China, a strategic competitor to the West, could strain these relationships and undermine Canada’s position within the alliance.
• National Security Concerns: Relying on Chinese-made military hardware could expose Canada to potential vulnerabilities, such as embedded surveillance or control mechanisms that could compromise operational security.
• Escalation of Tensions: Such a move could be seen as aligning with China’s geopolitical interests, potentially escalating tensions with the U.S. and other allies.

---

2. Ethical and Human Rights Concerns

• Human Rights Record: China has been criticized for its human rights record, including issues related to Xinjiang, Tibet, Hong Kong, and its treatment of political dissidents. Purchasing military equipment from China could be seen as indirectly supporting these practices.
• Lack of Transparency: China’s military-industrial complex operates with limited transparency, raising concerns about the ethical sourcing of materials and labor used in the production of its military equipment.

---

3. Operational and Technical Challenges

• Interoperability Issues: Canadian forces are integrated with NATO and other Western allies, which use compatible systems and equipment. Chinese-made jets and warships may not be interoperable with existing Canadian and allied systems, complicating joint operations.
• Quality and Reliability: While China has made significant advancements in military technology, its equipment has not been extensively tested in combat or used by Western nations. This raises questions about its reliability and performance compared to proven systems like the F-35.
• Maintenance and Support: Establishing a supply chain and maintenance infrastructure for Chinese-made equipment would be costly and logistically challenging, especially given the lack of existing partnerships.

Chinese Tengden TB-001 high-altitude drone, fully equipped with missiles and bombs

---

4. Economic and Industrial Implications

• Impact on Domestic Industry: Canada has a domestic defense industry that benefits from partnerships with Western manufacturers. Shifting to Chinese suppliers could harm these industries and result in job losses.
• Dependence on China: Relying on China for critical defense equipment could create an unhealthy dependence, especially given the potential for geopolitical tensions to disrupt supply chains.

---

5. Alternative Options for Canada

If Canada decides to cancel the F-35 purchase, there are other alternatives that align more closely with its strategic interests and values:

• European Options: Consider fighter jets like the Eurofighter Typhoon (Europe) or Dassault Rafale (France), which are produced by allied nations and offer advanced capabilities.
• Domestic Development: Invest in developing or co-developing military technology with allied nations to reduce dependence on foreign suppliers.
• Non-Aligned Options: Explore partnerships with other non-aligned but friendly nations for defense equipment, ensuring compatibility with NATO standards.

---

Conclusion

While concerns about the F-35 program are valid, purchasing military equipment from China is not a practical or advisable alternative for Canada. Such a move would introduce significant geopolitical, ethical, and operational risks. Instead, Canada should explore other options that align with its values and strategy.

Looks like CanuckAI is a lousy salesman… Too honest?

Dragon made up of drone swarm in China

Dragons made up of drone swarm in China
byu/MechwolfMachina inCyberpunk