The Horrendous Thorncliffe Park Fire
‘It’s been very stressful’: Residents spending 4th day away from home due to Thorncliffe Park fire
Outside the fire in Thorncliffe Park
byu/inconsolablespirit intoronto
BETRAYED IN THE BURNING COLD: How Olivia Chow’s Toronto Abandoned Thorncliffe Park Residents to a Predictable Inferno
By Eddie Hardie 🍁 Integrity Canada
TORONTO – As shivering families spend their fourth day exiled from their homes in the dead of a Canadian winter, the smoke rising from the ruins of the Thorncliffe Park fire carries a foul, familiar stench: the rot of municipal corruption and cowardly negligence, reaching straight to the office of Mayor Olivia Chow.
This isn’t just an “accident.” This is a bloody indictment.
While the official line will chirp about “a burning cigarette butt” and unfortunate sparks, the real tinder fueling this disaster was stacked years ago by corrupt City of Toronto officials who have brazenly sold public safety for backroom favors. And Mayor Chow, despite her progressive branding, stands accused of being complicit in the lawbreaking.
“Someone is jumping! Someone is jumping!” — A Chilling Prophecy Ignored
The residents of Thorncliffe Park have been screaming into a void for years. They didn’t just see a potential fire hazard; they foresaw Grenfell Tower on Canadian soil.
In a desperate plea, they explicitly raised the London Inferno—the 2014 Grenfell Tower fire that killed 12 and injured 74—as a horrifying preview of Toronto’s future if violations were ignored. Their warnings were met with the glacial, soul-crushing indifference of a bureaucracy they believe is rotten to its core.
And why wouldn’t they believe that? Look at the brazen, open-secret corruption. As documented, a senior official was caught openly bragging about taking bribes from a “friend” they had never met. This is the culture. This is the environment where public safety dies.
A Garage, A Fence, and a Middle Finger to the Law
The proof is in the permits—and in the flagrant violations that city officials willfully allow to stand.
Take the specific, mind-numbing case detailed by the Canuck🍁Post: a confirmed fire hazard structure was illegally erected. The law requires a 1.2-meter setback. It was built on the borderline. The Ontario Municipal Board ordered the City to comply with the law. The City’s response? A corrupt shrug. The owner, flush with confidence from his insider protection and as if the fire hazard isn’t hazardous enough, recently added a wooden fence to make it even more hazardous by linking his illegal garage built with an illegal carport permit.
Newly Erected Illegal/Dangerous Fence at 15 Rutherglen Road (City Reference #07756565 etc.)
The law is very clear that no wooden fence is allowed to connect to any building under any circumstances, becaise that will make it it a 100% Fire Hazards in violation of various bylaws as well as building code, fire code, etc.
See LAW VIOLATIONS hereunder.
Illegal Extension – Fire Hazards
This structure violated all safety law of all levels (municipal, provincial, federal).

This is not an oversight. This is a calculated, arrogant middle finger to every resident who believes the law should protect them.
The Towering Pile of Violations They Called “Home”
The list of ignored violations is so long, so technical, and so deliberately obtuse that it clearly serves as a smokescreen for negligence. It’s a bureaucratic fortress behind which cowards hide.
-
Fire Hazard Violations [Building Code 9.10.14.4.(2)] – ignored.
-
Sightline Obstructions (§447, §950) – ignored.
-
Dozens of specific bylaw breaches (§ 629-12, 13, 16, 18, 27, 40, etc.) – ignored.
-
Building Code Act Violations (Chapter 23, Regulation 332/12, Division C, Part 1) – ignored.
This is the “safety” that Olivia Chow’s administration is responsible for. It’s a goddarn joke. A frightening, lethal joke.
The Chain of Corruption: From City Hall to the Premier’s Office
And where does this culture of impunity end? Residents point a furious finger higher, at Premier of Ontario Doug Ford whose own legacy is so mired in scandal that his “achievement” list reads like a chronicle of controversies. When the head of the province is seen by many as a known figure in corruption scandals, is it any surprise that municipal officials feel empowered to break the law and endanger lives? Isn’t this a typical textbook case of “Leadership by Example”?
This is the ecosystem. This is why nothing gets fixed. This is why people die in fire while the mayor’s office likely drafts another empty statement of “concern.”
Emotional Betrayal: “It’s Been Very Stressful”
“It’s been very stressful,” a displaced resident told CityNews. That quote is a monument to Canadian understatement. The real emotions are white-hot rage, deep-seated resentment, and a profound sense of betrayal.
- They are betrayed by officials who took bribes.
- Betrayed by inspectors who looked the other way.
- Betrayed by a mayor who knowingly and wilfully allows lawbreaking that risks public life.
- Betrayed by a system that views them as collateral damage in a game of power and payoffs.
This fire was not an act of God. It was an act of Cowardice. It was an act of Corruption.
The ashes of Thorncliffe Park are Olivia Chow’s political legacy unless she acts with a fury and transparency she has never shown. Tear down the illegal structures. Fire the bragging bureaucrats. Prosecute the corrupt. Do your f—ing job.
Because the next time residents scream “Someone is jumping!”, the blood will not just be on the hands of some unnamed official. It will be squarely on the hands of the Mayor who let it happen.
SOURCES:
-
London Inferno – “Posing Fire Risks & Killing A Few Is Okay”
- Why London Inferno Will Happen in Toronto
- Mayor Chow Complicit in Lawbreaking
- Ontario Building Code Act & Toronto Municipal Code Violations
-
Hong Kong Fire Death Toll Rises: BBC News
-
The Thorncliffe Park Betrayal: Canuck Post Report
LAW VIOLATIONS
Including but not limited to,
A. Transportation Services Related Violations
1. Sidewalk Pedestrian Slip & Fall Injury Risks
Unsafe and unlawful drainage of water directly discharged into the sidewalk. The water will freeze up during the colder days, and posing injury risks to the pedestrian and vehicular traffics – Public safety hazard violated numberous safety laws under the purview of Transportation Services, and MLS, and Toronto Building.
2. SIGHTLINE OBSTRUCTION VIOLATIONS
Bylaw Chapter 447, Chapter 743 & Chapter 950 enacted to safeguard pedestrians on the sidewalk as below: –
– § 447-2 C.(1)C.1 – MLS: “One of the fundamental aims is to ensure that sight lines are not obstructed so as to create hazards for both pedestrian and vehicular traffic.”
– § 950-200.A.
– § 743-31.A.(1) & (2)
– § 743-34.(2)(a)[1] & [2]
– § 743-36.I.
– § 743-38.B.
– § 743-43.A.
– § 743-44. D.
– § 743-44B & C.
– § 743-51.A. & B.
– § 743-52.
– APPENDIX A.6. & 21.
B. MLS Related Violations
Main violations – Fire Hazard [Building Code 9.10.14.4.(2)] & Sightline Obstruction (§447, §950 & numberous Zoning Bylaws).
– § 629-12
– § 629-13
– § 629-16.A.(3)
– § 629-18.A., B. & C.
– § 629-27.A. & B.
– § 629-40.A
– § 447
– § 950
– § 629-8. & § 632-2.
– § 629-10.A. & B.
– § 629-23.
– § 629-6.D. & G.
– § 629-4.A.
– § 629-5.A.
– § 629-6.A., D., & G.
– § 629-20
– § 629-11.A.1. (2) & F. (1), (2) & (3)
– § 629-11
– § 629-23.H.
C. Building Code Related Violations
Building Code Act, 1992
– CHAPTER 23 10.(2), (b) & 10.(1)
– Chapter 363 Article V
– Ontario Regulation 332/12
– Chapter 950
– Division C, Part 1, Subsection 1.3.3.
– Application H. iii) & iv)Ontario Building Code Act
– Section 8(2)(a)Building Code: –
– 3.1.18.1.
– 9.14.6.1.(1)
– 9.26.18.2.(1)
– 2.2.1.1. Objectives (1) Category: Safety Number: OS Objective & Category: Safety — Safety in Use Number: OS3 Objective
Bylaw 569-2013
– 10.20.40.70.(3)
– 10.5.60.20 (3)(C)(i) & (ii), (6)(B)
Leaside Zoning Bylaw 1916: –
– 5.5
– 5.13.2
– 6.1.1 (1)
– 6.1.1(4)
– 6.3.3 Side Yard Setback
– 6.3.3 Rear Yard Setback
– 6.3.3 Side Yard Setback Between Dwellings
– 6.7.4
E. Breached City of Toronto Code of Conduct for Chief Building Official and Inspectors
– 1. a) & b)
– 2. a), b), c), d) & e)
– 4. a), b), c), d) & e)
– 5. a), b), c), d) & e)
– 7.
– 8. b)
F. Other Applicable Law Violation
– Section E: Ontario Municipal Board (OMB): No new application applied, no compliance with all currently in-force law.
– Planning Act – PART I, PROVINCIAL ADMINISTRATION, Provincial interest, Section 2.(h), (o)
– Provincial Policy Statement (PPS) – 3.0 Protecting Public Health and Safety.
– City of Toronto Act, 2001, Chap. Pr13 (Bill Pr20) False Declarations
– No Urban Forestry permission sought to injure a matured tree behind the garage.
– No Zoning Certificate or Preliminary Project Review (PPR) for extended Zoning & Plan Review
– At least 13 illegal building & structural deficiencies
G. Criminal Code of Canada (R.S.C., 1985, c. C-46)
219 (1) Every one is criminally negligent who
(a) in doing anything, or
(b) in omitting to do anything that it is his duty to do,
shows wanton or reckless disregard for the lives or safety of other persons.ii) WILFUL AND FORBIDDEN ACTS IN RESPECT OF CERTAIN PROPERTY
429 (1) Every one who causes the occurrence of an event by doing an act or by omitting to do an act that it is his duty to do, knowing that the act or omission will probably cause the occurrence of the event and being reckless whether the event occurs or not, shall be deemed, for the purposes of this Part, wilfully to have caused the occurrence of the event.
Our power-that-be just flip a middle finger when asked “What authorized you to violate all the laws?”
See the problem in this country now?
For the good of Canada, check out 🍁 Integrity Canada … Let’s try to salvage this rotten nation….










A SLAP IN THE FACE TO ONTARIO: How Doug Ford Funneled $2 Million of YOUR Money to His Family’s F—ing Dentist
Whaddaya Say?