The Century Initiative: Liberals Conspiracy to increase Population to 100 million, a number we simply do not have the resources to sustain and Canada just sets Record for number of Refugee Claims… a whopping 174,000 new claims

Britons call Carney a “Voodoo Economist operating with a Broken Crystal Ball“ for a good reason

The Liberals Immigration Conspiracy

Liberals conspire to flood Canada with 100 million people, a number we simply do not have the resources to sustain in every sense of the word. There is no money, no job, no housing… no nothing that suggests we have what it takes to feed 100 millions with only oil and some agricultural produce.

So, why are Liberals hell bent on importing so many immigrants with a large number living on long term social assistance and contribute nothing to the society except trouble? We therefore believe this is a conspiracy based on fallacy and egregious intent ie. Liberals hope to stay in power forever with immigrants as their support base… who have been indoctrinated to vote for Liberals Party as the de facto “Immigrant Party’, perhaps the Liberals actually also believe massive population equal market, power, and influence.

Really?

Well, just look at India for an idea… They have 1.5 billion souls with a quarter living under $1 per day, half are illiterate and defecating on the street. One doesn’t  need more facts to know the answer is a big fat NO… It’s Falsehood.

That said, why would one believes Canada is any better than India if the country is populated with 100 millions? Do we have the jobs? The answer is none. Do we have anything else to sustain such an explosive population increase? The answer is again simply “Nope… zero, zip, zilch, nada”.

Poll: First impressions of the Century Initiative’s plan for 100 million Canadians were overwhelmingly unfavourable

But wait, are Liberals the culprit behind the controversial Century Initiative?

Check this out for an idea: Carney adds Century Initiative co-founder to Canada-U.S. council

---

In recent years, Canada has seen a significant increase in refugee claims in recent years, with 2023 marking a record high. Here are some key details:

Record-Breaking Refugee Claims in Canada

• In 2023, Canada received over 144,000 new asylum claims, the highest number ever recorded in a single year. This surpassed the previous peak of around 90,000 claims in 2019.

• Major entry points include airports (where claimants arrive on visas before applying for asylum) and irregular crossings like Roxham Road (before its closure in March 2023 under the Canada-U.S. Safe Third Country Agreement (STCA) expansion).

2024 Canada sets record for number of refugee claims

A new UN report says Canada was fourth in the world for number of claims and also the second-largest resettlement country globally.

Canada has moved up one spot to become the fourth largest recipient country of asylum seekers, according to the United Nations Refugee Agency.

Last year, Canada received a record 174,000 new refugee claims, of the 3.1 million new claims reported worldwide, said the agency’s 2024 global trends report released on Thursday. Canada was behind the U.S. (729,100), Egypt (433,900), Germany (229,800). In fifth was Spain at 167,400.

---

The main culprit to the prevailing immigration problems is the conspiracy simply known as “Century Initiative“.

The Century Initiative’s 100-million population goal, it has become a proxy battle in wider debates over immigration, housing, and Canada’s future.

The Century Initiative: Details and Controversies

The Century Initiative is a Canadian nonprofit organization and think tank that advocates for increasing Canada’s population to 100 million by 2100. It argues that a larger population would strengthen Canada’s economy, global influence, and social programs amid an aging demographic. However, the proposal has sparked significant debate and criticism.

1. Origins and Key Figures

• Founded in 2011 (originally as the “Canada 2100” initiative).

• Key Leaders:

  • Dominic Barton (former Canadian Ambassador to China, ex-McKinsey Global Managing Director) – a prominent advocate.

  • Mark Wiseman (former BlackRock executive).

  • Consulting ties: Some members have links to McKinsey & Company, which has advised governments on immigration policies.

• Registered as a charity, allowing it to influence policy discussions.

2. The Century Initiative’s Core Argument

The group claims that:
✅ Economic Growth: More people = larger workforce, innovation, and GDP growth.
✅ Aging Population: More young immigrants offset declining birth rates.
✅ Global Influence: A bigger population would make Canada a stronger player on the world stage (e.g., like the U.S. or EU).

Proposed Strategy:

• Increase annual immigration to 1.3% of Canada’s population (currently ~500,000/year, would eventually rise to ~1 million/year).

• Boost birth rates through family-friendly policies (though immigration is the primary driver).

• Urban expansion to accommodate growth (e.g., more housing, infrastructure).

3. Government Ties and Influence

• Not an official government policy, but its ideas align with Canada’s high immigration targets.

• Links to Liberal government policies:

  • Immigration levels have risen sharply under Trudeau (from ~260,000/year in 2015 to ~500,000/year in 2024).

  • Some policymakers (e.g., former Immigration Minister Sean Fraser) have referenced long-term population growth goals.

• Critics allege the Century Initiative has undue influence on government policy, though no direct proof of a conspiracy exists.

4. Major Criticisms and Controversies

A. Housing Crisis & Infrastructure Strain

• Canada already faces a severe housing shortage; critics argue rapid population growth worsens affordability.

• Healthcare, schools, and transit systems are struggling to keep up with current growth.

B. Economic Concerns

• Wage suppression: Some economists argue mass immigration can depress wages in certain sectors.

• GDP per capita stagnation: While total GDP grows, individual living standards may not improve.

C. Demographic & Cultural Pushback

• Fear of lost national identity: Some worry rapid demographic change could fuel social tensions.

• Environmental impact: More people = higher carbon footprint, urban sprawl.

D. McKinsey & Corporate Influence

• Critics highlight ties between Century Initiative leaders and McKinsey & Company, which has advised governments on privatization and cost-cutting policies.

• Some see this as corporate-driven population growth benefiting big business over ordinary Canadians.

5. Is the Government Secretly Following the Century Initiative?

• No direct evidence of a secret plan, but immigration policies align with its goals.

• The Liberals deny working directly with the group but share similar long-term visions.

• Opposition parties (Conservatives, PPC) criticize the idea, with Pierre Poilievre (Conservative leader) calling it “radical.”

“Scary Scenes”: Thousands Of Indian Students In Canada Queue For Waiter Jobs

6. Public Opinion & Political Debate

• Supporters: Business groups, pro-immigration advocates, some economists.

• Opponents: Housing activists, anti-mass immigration groups, some conservatives.

• Most Canadians are unaware of the Century Initiative, but polls show growing concern over immigration

• levels.

---

Deeper Analysis: Political Stances & Polling Data on Canada’s Population Growth Debate

The Century Initiative’s 100-million population goal remains unofficial government policy, but it has become a proxy battle in wider debates over immigration, housing, and Canada’s future. Below is a detailed breakdown of party positions, voter sentiment, and polling trends.

1. Liberal Party – “Growth is Necessary, But We’re Not Officially Endorsing 100M”

Official Stance:

• Supports high immigration (~500,000/year) for economic growth, labor shortages, and demographic balance.

Internal Divisions:

• Suburban/Rural Liberals: Worry about backlash from housing shortages, especially in swing ridings.

Polling Impact:

• Core Support: Liberals retain strong backing from immigrant communities (especially South Asian voters).

• Erosion in Young Voters: Rising anger over housing unaffordability (18-34 age group turning to NDP/Conservatives).

2. Conservative Party – “We’ll Fix the Mess, But Won’t Slash Immigration”

Official Stance:

• Calls Century Initiative “radical” but doesn’t reject population growth outright.

Strategic Nuance:

• Populist Wing: Responds to anti-immigration sentiment in rural and working-class bases.

Key Quotes:

• Poilievre (2024): “We need homes, not more chaos. Immigration must align with our capacity to build.”

• Michelle Rempel Garner (Former Conservative MP): “The Century Initiative is a thought experiment, not Conservative policy.”

Polling Impact:

• Leading by 10-15% nationally, partly due to immigration-housing backlash.

3. NDP – “Pro-Immigration, But Workers Come First”

Official Stance: Supports high immigration but emphasizes rights for migrants and temporary workers.

• No position on 100M target—focuses on affordable housing and healthcare for all.

• Criticizes “exploitative” temporary foreign worker programs.

Polling Impact:

• Stuck at ~18-20% support—losing some working-class voters to Conservatives over housing.

4. Bloc Québécois – “Non à 100 Millions”

Official Stance:

• Rejects Century Initiative as a threat to Quebec’s culture and autonomy.

• Demands full control of immigration (currently, Quebec selects ~50% of its immigrants).

• Warns of “anglicization” if Canada grows too quickly.

Key Quotes:

• Yves-François Blanchet (2024): “Ottawa’s obsession with growth ignores Quebec’s unique needs.”

• Jean-François Roberge (CAQ Minister): “We will not be a dormitory for Toronto’s labor market.”

Polling Impact:

• Holds steady at ~30% in Quebec—immigration is a mobilizing issue for nationalist voters.

5. People’s Party (PPC) – “Stop the Great Replacement”

Official Stance:

• Wants immigration slashed to ~100,000/year.

• Calls Century Initiative a “globalist plot” to dilute Canadian identity.

• Attracts conspiracy-leaning voters (e.g., “Great Replacement” theory adherents).

Key Quotes:

• Maxime Bernier (2024): “The elites want to turn Canada into a crowded, rootless zone. We say no!”

• PPC Platform: “Mass immigration drives down wages and destroys social cohesion.”

Polling Impact:

• 3-5% nationally, but drains populist Conservatives in tight races.

• Most influential in rural Western Canada.

Chaotic Immigrants Brawl In Brampton

6. Public Opinion & Polling Trends

Latest Polls (June 2024):

Demographic Splits:

• Under 35: 58% say immigration is too high (housing fears dominate).

• Immigrant Communities: 65% support current/higher levels.

• Conservatives: 78% say immigration too high; Liberals/NDP: ~35%.

Election Impact:

• Top issue in suburbs/swing ridings (e.g., Ontario 905, Greater Vancouver).

• Liberals risk losing “cost-of-living” voters if seen as prioritizing growth over affordability.

Conclusion: A Political Tinderbox

• Liberals walk a tightrope—keep immigration high, promise better planning…. but has failed in very sense of the word.

• Conservatives exploit frustration but won’t radically cut numbers.

• PPC & Bloc weaponize the issue for their bases.

• 2025 Election Wildcard: If housing stays unaffordable, immigration could become the defining issue.

---

For some bizarre logic, Indians believe they have the right to live in Canada, and even tell the white populace to go back to Europe?